After a car crash, determining who was at fault is critical to resolving legal and insurance issues. In Michigan, where no-fault insurance laws play a major role in how medical expenses and lost wages are covered, proving that someone else caused the accident becomes especially important if you want to step outside the no-fault system and seek compensation for pain and suffering or excess losses. One of the ways accident victims and attorneys work to establish fault is by using eyewitness testimony.
Eyewitness accounts can offer a firsthand view of how the crash happened. These statements often provide details that might not be captured in police reports, surveillance footage, or even vehicle damage. When used correctly, witness testimony can add weight to a personal injury claim and help clarify responsibility. However, the effectiveness of this type of evidence depends on several factors.
What Makes Eyewitness Testimony Valuable
Not every witness statement will carry the same weight. Courts and insurance companies tend to consider a few key factors when determining how credible a witness is. These include the witness’s proximity to the crash, their ability to see clearly, how soon after the crash they gave their statement, and whether their account matches other available evidence.
For example, a pedestrian standing on the sidewalk at the time of the crash is likely to be viewed as more reliable than someone who only arrived after the accident occurred. A witness who was not distracted and had a clear line of sight may also be seen as more trustworthy than someone who only caught a glimpse of the impact.
In some Michigan car accident cases, multiple witnesses may offer similar statements, reinforcing each other’s credibility. When this happens, it becomes more difficult for the at-fault party to dispute the victim’s version of events. That said, inconsistencies between witness accounts do not necessarily make all testimony invalid. Skilled attorneys can examine where those inconsistencies exist and explain them in the context of a larger narrative.
Eyewitnesses Can Help Reconstruct the Crash
A single moment of distraction or a split-second traffic violation can lead to a serious collision. But determining exactly what happened isn’t always easy. That’s where neutral observers can help.
Eyewitness testimony often assists in reconstructing how an accident unfolded. Someone may have seen a driver run a red light or make an unsafe left turn. Another person might recall the speed at which the vehicles were traveling or whether one driver appeared to be texting or distracted.
This type of information is especially useful in “he said, she said” scenarios where both drivers blame each other. In the absence of clear video footage or digital data from the vehicle, testimony from a third party who was not involved can break the tie.
Michigan’s Comparative Fault Rule and the Role of Witnesses
Michigan follows a modified comparative fault rule. Under this rule, an injured person can still recover damages even if they were partially at fault for the accident—so long as they were less than 50% responsible. However, their compensation is reduced by their percentage of fault.
For instance, if you’re awarded $100,000 in damages but found to be 20% at fault, you would receive $80,000. But if you’re found to be 51% or more at fault, you cannot recover non-economic damages like pain and suffering.
Eyewitnesses can play a major role in this type of situation. Their observations may help reduce the percentage of fault assigned to the injured person or prove that the other party was mostly or entirely responsible. This can make the difference between recovering a significant settlement or walking away with nothing beyond basic no-fault benefits.
Challenges to Using Eyewitness Testimony
While helpful, eyewitness statements are not without their flaws. Memory can fade or become distorted over time. Stress, lighting conditions, and even personal bias may affect what a person thinks they saw. Because of this, insurance companies often try to discredit witnesses by questioning their reliability.
It’s not uncommon for defense attorneys to point out that a witness didn’t see the entire event or that they changed parts of their story. They may also highlight anything that could undermine the witness’s credibility, such as poor eyesight or a close relationship with one of the parties.
These challenges don’t automatically make eyewitness testimony useless. But they do show why it’s important to collect statements quickly, while the details are still fresh. An attorney can help by interviewing witnesses as soon as possible, recording their statements, and preparing them for depositions or trial.
How Attorneys Use Witnesses to Build a Stronger Case
Personal injury lawyers in Michigan understand how to use witness statements to strengthen an accident claim. They know what questions to ask, how to preserve statements, and how to compare those accounts with other evidence like police reports, dash cam footage, and accident reconstruction expert findings.
In some cases, a lawyer may call a witness to testify in court. In others, the witness’s statement might be used during settlement negotiations to encourage the insurance company to make a fair offer. Either way, having reliable eyewitness accounts on your side often puts pressure on the defense to acknowledge fault.
Witness Testimony in the Broader Legal Context
Eyewitness accounts are just one piece of the puzzle. They work best when combined with other forms of evidence. A strong case might also include photographs from the scene, vehicle damage assessments, medical records, and expert opinions. Witnesses help fill in the gaps and support the overall timeline of events.
In Michigan, where personal injury claims can quickly become complex due to the state’s unique no-fault system, having a well-supported case is crucial. The more evidence you have pointing to the other party’s responsibility, the better your chances of recovering damages beyond what no-fault benefits offer.
What to Do If You’re in an Accident and There Are Witnesses
If you’re involved in an accident and there are people nearby who may have seen what happened, take steps to preserve their accounts. Ask for their contact information. Note where they were standing or driving. If they’re willing, have them write down or record what they saw.
Even if you’re unsure about fault in the moment, these witness statements may become valuable later. Your attorney can follow up and determine how best to use the information.
Conclusion
Eyewitness testimony remains one of the most powerful tools for proving fault in Michigan accident cases. While it’s not perfect, it can offer clarity in situations where the facts are disputed. In a state where your ability to recover certain damages depends on proving someone else caused the crash, having someone who saw what really happened can make all the difference.
Working with an experienced personal injury attorney is the best way to ensure eyewitness statements are properly collected, preserved, and used to their full advantage. If you’ve been injured in an accident and need help proving fault, don’t wait to seek legal guidance. The sooner you act, the more effective your case can be.
ADDRESS 
CONTACT 
EMAIL